Keyword summary
90%1 analyzed article/video729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cafe Standards results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 3,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,187 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,850 of 37,536 keywords). This Cafe Standards is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Cafe Standards
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Cafe Standards (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,187
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 23.9%23.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos