Keyword summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Buyers results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,661 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (27,637 of 37,536 keywords). This Buyers is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Buyers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠27%Buyers (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,661
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos