Keyword summary
57%5 analyzed articles/videos4,341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Businesses results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,326 hits. Analysis detected 14,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,004 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,322 of 37,536 keywords). This Businesses is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Businesses
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
20%Businesses (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,004
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510019.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles17K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.0%0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate