Keyword summary
15% 1 analyzed article/video 508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burnt Cedar Beach results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 86 hits . Analysis detected 524 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (42,488 of 54,553 keywords). This Burnt Cedar Beach is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group. Burnt Cedar Beach
Keyword details
Total words: 2,032
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst