Keyword summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burning Man results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 1,644 hits. Analysis detected 6,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,908 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (16,679 of 37,536 keywords). This Burning Man is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Burning Man
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠56%Burning Man (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,908
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 33.5%33.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.7%17.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos