Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burning Hills Amphitheatre results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Halo Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 359 hits . Analysis detected 2,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 31% (25,943 of 37,536 keywords). This Burning Hills Amphitheatre is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Burning Hills Amphitheatre
Keyword details
Total words: 3,436
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst