Keyword summary
72%4 analyzed articles/videos1,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burglary results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 760 hits. Analysis detected 4,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,118 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,377 of 37,536 keywords). This Burglary is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Burglary
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
38%Burglary (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,118
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate