Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Process results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 637 hits . Analysis detected 4,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,844 of 37,536 keywords). This Budget Process is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. Budget Process
Keyword details
Total words: 4,736
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst