Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Gap results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 2,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (19,607 of 37,533 keywords). This Budget Gap is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Budget Gap
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠48%Budget Gap (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos