Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,280 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Buckingham Palace results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 453 hits . Analysis detected 3,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,120 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,890 of 37,536 keywords). This Buckingham Palace is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Buckingham Palace
Keyword details
Total words: 5,120
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst