Keyword summary
41% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brutalism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 2,123 hits . Analysis detected 16,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,288 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,361 of 37,118 keywords). This Brutalism is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Brutalism
Keyword details
Total words: 23,288
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles23.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst