Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Britney Spears Video Liquor Store Barking Knife Restaurant results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 1,837 hits . Analysis detected 8,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,987 of 37,536 keywords). This Britney Spears Video Liquor Store Barking Knife Restaurant is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Britney Spears Video Liquor Store Barking Knife Restaurant
Keyword details
Total words: 5,336
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 34.4% 34.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 34.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst