Keyword summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video2,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These British Security Project results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 1,767 hits. Analysis detected 10,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (12,368 of 37,536 keywords). This British Security Project is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
British Security Project
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 6,237
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 28.3%28.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 16.2%16.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos