Keyword summary
54%1 analyzed article/video672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These British Authorities results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 1,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,679 of 37,536 keywords). This British Authorities is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
British Authorities
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%British Authorities (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos