Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Britbox results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,236 hits . Analysis detected 7,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,448 of 36,961 keywords). This Britbox is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Britbox
Keyword details
Total words: 11,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst