Keyword summary
87%1 analyzed article/video774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brit Marling results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 2,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,322 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,654 of 37,536 keywords). This Brit Marling is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Brit Marling
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
72%Brit Marling (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,322
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos