Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brianna Lyman results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 45.9% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (966 of 37,536 keywords). This Brianna Lyman is worse (more manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Brianna Lyman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠98%Brianna Lyman (selected)14%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

97% percentile
025507510097.4% percentile
13.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles580 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 45.9%45.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 33.3%33.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 29.5%29.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 32.4%32.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 24.0%24.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Keyword 15.9%15.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Keyword 45.9%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 33.3%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 32.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 29.5%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%No True Scotsman: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%False DilemmaSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos