Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Seitz results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 2,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,062 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,125 of 37,536 keywords). This Brian Seitz is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Brian Seitz
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
20%Brian Seitz (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,062
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos