Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Niccol results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 581 hits . Analysis detected 2,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,083 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,381 of 37,536 keywords). This Brian Niccol is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group. Brian Niccol
Keyword details
Total words: 1,083
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.3% percentile 11.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 53.6% 53.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 51.8% 51.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 18.7% 18.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Optimism Bias: Keyword 53.6%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 51.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst