Keyword summary
12%3 analyzed articles/videos2,978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Sorsby results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,539 hits. Analysis detected 8,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,414 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (27,463 of 35,668 keywords). This Brendan Sorsby is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Brendan Sorsby
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
23%Brendan Sorsby (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,414
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate