Keyword summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos3,005 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Creighton results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 1,143 hits. Analysis detected 7,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,015 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (28,369 of 37,536 keywords). This Brandon Creighton is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Brandon Creighton
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠25%Brandon Creighton (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,015
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos