Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Bosley results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Horn Effect, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 1,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,583 of 37,536 keywords). This Brandon Bosley is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Brandon Bosley
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
24%Brandon Bosley (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos