Keyword summary
30%2 analyzed articles/videos1,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bradley Barcola results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 1,150 hits. Analysis detected 3,981 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,218 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,891 of 37,536 keywords). This Bradley Barcola is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Bradley Barcola
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
42%Bradley Barcola (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,218
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.0%22.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate