Keyword summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Raffensperger results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 1,661 hits . Analysis detected 7,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,822 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,942 of 37,536 keywords). This Brad Raffensperger is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Brad Raffensperger
Keyword details
Total words: 4,822
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 34.5% 34.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 34.5%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst