Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Banderman results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 327 hits . Analysis detected 1,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (34,083 of 37,536 keywords). This Brad Banderman is better (less manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group. Brad Banderman
Keyword details
Total words: 3,824
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst