Keyword summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Botticelli's Venus results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 478 hits . Analysis detected 3,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,502 of 37,536 keywords). This Botticelli's Venus is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Botticelli's Venus
Keyword details
Total words: 3,076
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.7% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst