Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Botnets results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 435 hits . Analysis detected 3,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,301 of 37,536 keywords). This Botnets is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Botnets
Keyword details
Total words: 4,720
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst