Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bornholm results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 865 hits. Analysis detected 6,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,360 of 37,536 keywords). This Bornholm is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Bornholm
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
12%Bornholm (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,316
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos