Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Boreal Forest results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 320 hits . Analysis detected 2,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,350 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Boreal Forest is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Boreal Forest
Keyword details
Total words: 4,350
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst