Keyword summary
30% 1 analyzed article/video 722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Crossing results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 99 hits . Analysis detected 1,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,166 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (28,085 of 37,536 keywords). This Border Crossing is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Border Crossing
Keyword details
Total words: 2,166
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst