Keyword summary
81%1 analyzed article/video768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Crisis results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 1,065 hits. Analysis detected 7,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,324 of 37,321 keywords). This Border Crisis is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Border Crisis
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
86%Border Crisis (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,072
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 34.7%34.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 26.0%26.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 12.1%12.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 26.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos