Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Booze Nation results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 798 hits. Analysis detected 7,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,773 of 37,536 keywords). This Booze Nation is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Booze Nation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
21%Booze Nation (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos