Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boomer Esiason results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 492 hits . Analysis detected 2,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,558 of 36,916 keywords). This Boomer Esiason is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Boomer Esiason
Keyword details
Total words: 2,424
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst