Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,518 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boko Haram results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 473 hits . Analysis detected 5,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,897 of 37,536 keywords). This Boko Haram is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Boko Haram
Keyword details
Total words: 6,072
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst