Keyword summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Lee results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 158 hits . Analysis detected 1,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,331 of 37,536 keywords). This Bob Lee is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Bob Lee
Keyword details
Total words: 3,232
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst