Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Bowman results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 3,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,606 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,758 of 35,666 keywords). This Bob Bowman is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Bob Bowman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
45%Bob Bowman (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,606
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos