Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blue Blood results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Overconfidence Bias , and Recency Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 431 hits . Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (20,607 of 36,716 keywords). This Blue Blood is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Blue Blood
Keyword details
Total words: 3,264
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst