Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Block The Bombs Act results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 883 hits. Analysis detected 5,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Block The Bombs Act is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Block The Bombs Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Block The Bombs Act (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 9.3%9.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.2%7.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos