Keyword summary
80%1 analyzed article/video858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blackpink results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 684 hits. Analysis detected 3,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (12,824 of 55,120 keywords). This Blackpink is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Blackpink
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
77%Blackpink (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos