Keyword summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blackpink results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 684 hits . Analysis detected 3,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (12,824 of 55,120 keywords). This Blackpink is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Blackpink
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.7% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst