Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Birmingham results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 549 hits . Analysis detected 4,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,414 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,286 of 36,095 keywords). This Birmingham is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Birmingham
Keyword details
Total words: 3,414
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.8% percentile 5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst