Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bipartisan Concern results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 2,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (14,956 of 36,868 keywords). This Bipartisan Concern is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Bipartisan Concern
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠60%Bipartisan Concern (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos