Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bipartisan Commission results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 506 hits. Analysis detected 4,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (18,706 of 36,715 keywords). This Bipartisan Commission is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Bipartisan Commission
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠50%Bipartisan Commission (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,432
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos