Keyword summary
97%1 analyzed article/video651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biosolids results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 4,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,953 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,974 of 37,536 keywords). This Biosolids is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Biosolids
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
90%Biosolids (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,953
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510089.4% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 35.4%35.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 21.6%21.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 35.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Straw Man: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos