Keyword summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biohacking results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 791 hits . Analysis detected 7,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,663 of 37,536 keywords). This Biohacking is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Biohacking
Keyword details
Total words: 7,616
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst