Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Binge Watching results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 823 hits . Analysis detected 7,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,467 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,787 of 37,536 keywords). This Binge Watching is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Binge Watching
Keyword details
Total words: 5,467
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst