Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Binge Watching results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 823 hits. Analysis detected 7,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,467 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,787 of 37,536 keywords). This Binge Watching is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Binge Watching
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
64%Binge Watching (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,467
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.1%15.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos