Keyword summary
12%2 analyzed articles/videos1,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Binding Arbitration results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 703 hits. Analysis detected 4,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,335 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,474 of 37,536 keywords). This Binding Arbitration is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Binding Arbitration
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
11%Binding Arbitration (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,335
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos