Keyword summary
â 52% 1 analyzed article/video 1,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billion Dollar Revenue results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Hindsight Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 305 hits . Analysis detected 2,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 34% (37,208 of 55,692 keywords). This Billion Dollar Revenue is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Billion Dollar Revenue
Keyword details
Total words: 4,416
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst