Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Otto results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 251 hits . Analysis detected 1,762 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,892 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,828 of 37,536 keywords). This Bill Otto is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Bill Otto
Keyword details
Total words: 2,892
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst