Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Big Mac results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Quote-first Misdirection, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 2,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Big Mac is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Big Mac
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Big Mac (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos