Keyword summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beverly Hills results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 4,761 hits . Analysis detected 29,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,948 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (27,966 of 36,052 keywords). This Beverly Hills is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Beverly Hills
Keyword details
Total words: 31,948
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles31.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst